So, the BMAA printed the first part of my email, but not the follow-up.

Deliberately misleading??? Mischief making??? Or just a good story to stir things up???

The tirade of abuse I received in the magazine was obviously uncalled for as the complete situation was never explained by the editor or the chief executive.

Both the Chief Executive AND the magazine editor knew my thoughts on 'other' sorts of Microlights BEFORE they published the article.

You decide:-